<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Ajax Redux</title>
<link>http://ajaxredux.com/forum</link>
<description>the development of an open API</description>
<language>en-us</language>

<item>
<title>I got your security right here</title>
<link>http://ajaxredux.com/forum/stories.php?story=05/03/31/6717948</link>
<description>A client is asking me to port a MS Access application to a secure client-server model on the net. Is the Ajax-enabled web browser the best place for client apps that need maximum security measures?</description><dc:creator>Travis Wilson</dc:creator><dc:date>2005-03-31 17:05:17</dc:date></item>

<item>
<title>Two map sites that are better than Google</title>
<link>http://ajaxredux.com/forum/stories.php?story=05/03/25/8364157</link>
<description>Don't get me wrong; I think Google Maps is great. But here are two map applications that surpass it in many respects.

<a href="http://map.search.ch/index.en.html">Map of Switzerland</a> (<code>http://map.search.ch/index.en.html</code>). This has been around at least since the launch of Google Maps. Their street map overlays an aerial photo of the land</description><dc:creator>Travis Wilson</dc:creator><dc:date>2005-03-25 14:19:24</dc:date></item>

<item>
<title>Indirect stereotyping</title>
<link>http://ajaxredux.com/forum/stories.php?story=05/03/24/9533462</link>
<description>Try this: Fire up that browser popularity contest winner Internet Explorer on Windows. Go into its advanced security settings, and disable ActiveX (a common practice for the security-conscious). Now browse maps.google.com . The zoom bar (vertical slider usually found to the left of the map) is gone! The site is essentially unusable. And Google was trying to cater to all browsers, too.

Why does this happen?</description><dc:creator>Travis Wilson</dc:creator><dc:date>2005-03-24 13:38:53</dc:date></item>

<item>
<title>Submit form without affecting browser history</title>
<link>http://ajaxredux.com/forum/stories.php?story=05/03/21/8135248</link>
<description>Okay, I'll start. One Ajax design pattern I'd like to see supported goes as follows:

I want to be able to submit a form from javascript without affecting my browser history.

Forms are useful objects, well supported and manipulated by many third-party javascript libraries. Let's say you have a standard form on your page which will be used in an Ajax request, like so:</description><dc:creator>Travis Wilson</dc:creator><dc:date>2005-03-21 18:35:35</dc:date></item>

<item>
<title>Anyone can post here</title>
<link>http://ajaxredux.com/forum/stories.php?story=05/03/21/6893486</link>
<description>Full speed ahead, damn the torpedoes, anyone can post here -- new threads as well as comments on existing threads. I suppose we'll require registration at some point in the future, but for now we want to hear what you think. Your triumphs and obstacles in Ajax work, what you'd build if you had your</description><dc:creator>Travis Wilson</dc:creator><dc:date>2005-03-21 15:28:13</dc:date></item>

<item>
<title>A Call For Participation</title>
<link>http://ajaxredux.com/forum/stories.php?story=05/03/21/0018417</link>
<description>Ajax is just what Jesse says it is: a collection of technologies. It's a particular way to implement the functionality -- the intent -- that I hope we define here over the coming weeks. But should we focus on the specific technology?</description><dc:creator>Travis Wilson</dc:creator><dc:date>2005-03-21 13:33:38</dc:date></item>

</channel>
</rss>
